Damon W. Root, senior editor of Reason magazine and Reason.com, lays out the case:
1: The Individual Mandate Violates the Original Meaning of the Constitution
2. The Individual Mandate Rests on an Unbounded and Unprincipled Assertion of Federal Power
3. The Individual Mandate Cannot Be Justified Under Existing Supreme Court Precedent
4. The Individual Mandate Threatens the Foundations of Contract Law
1: The Individual Mandate Violates the Original Meaning of the Constitution
2. The Individual Mandate Rests on an Unbounded and Unprincipled Assertion of Federal Power
3. The Individual Mandate Cannot Be Justified Under Existing Supreme Court Precedent
4. The Individual Mandate Threatens the Foundations of Contract Law
No comments:
Post a Comment