The Washington Post has spent the last two months hoping to relive the attention it grabbed in 2006 when its relentless coverage of comment by Senator George Allen cost him the election. Continuing its tradition of trying to swing Virginia elections to Democrats, the Post's news page launched a relentless attack on Republican gubernatorial nominee Bob McDonnell, using every story on Virginia's statewide elections to draws voters' attention to a college thesis McDonnell wrote two decades ago expressing evangelical Christian views.
The Post first "reported" on the story Aug. 30, writing:
"(t)he Washington Post learned of the thesis in a recent interview with McDonnell, who mentioned it in answering a question about his political roots."
More stories followed. A lot more stories. A search of the Post's website finds at least 154 stories, article and editorials mentioning the issue in just the last eight weeks.
The Post continued to hammer the story on a near-daily basis, even going so far as to claim its coverage of the story was responsible for a short-lived spike in support for Democrat nominee State Senator Creigh Deeds. The fact less than one percent of voters in the Post's own survey considered it the top issue didn't stop the paper from using a self-conducted survey on its own story as an excuse to write another story.
Keep all that in mind. 154 different stories, articles and editorials about the thesis, including a poll that showed it wasn't an issue but was nevertheless reported as such. Looks like someone is working really hard to "publicize" something.
Well, the Post still sticks to its unofficial rule of making sure to mention "the thesis" in every story. But with polls opening in a few hours and Deeds facing a crushing defeat, the Post now reports the history of the "thesis issue" like this:
And Deeds's efforts to paint McDonnell as a radical conservative by publicizing the Republican's 20-year-old graduate school thesis, which criticized working women, single mothers and homosexuals, appears to have backfired -- most likely voters find Deeds too negative, according to polls.
After two month and 154 often self-congratulatory stories published on the issue, the Post suddenly makes absolutely no mention whatsoever of its own involvement. The Post now claims it was
Deeds who publicized the thesis, not the Post itself.
Not one mention of the fact it was the Post that first found the publicly-available thesis, not the Deeds campaign, or the fact any mentions of the thesis in Deeds ads were composed almost entirely of quotes from endless Post stories on the issue.
An important lesson learned for Virginia Democrats. The Washington Post is more than happy to turn its news pages into your campaign's talking point memos and sacrifice its credibility to throw elections, but you'd better win or else they'll turn their pens on you.